Some states only have their records online by county. Massachusetts Justice Project has put together a list of websites which are a good place to begin your search. We cannot provide a complete list of all the resources you can find online. If you are looking for a specific state or county that is not on our list, try searching in Google or another search engine for "[state where you are looking] court records" or "[county, state where you are looking] court records.
Inventory of county records, Orange County courthouse, Orange, Texas - The Portal to Texas History
Most courts have Supreme Court records online. We do not include links to Supreme Court records. State Supreme Courts generally do not provide the kind of information which would be useful. If you don't find what you're looking for there, most of the individual counties also have their own system of searchable records. I've included the links to the records search for some of the bigger counties here:. This is a fee-based service. No centralized records system, dependent on each county.
I've included the county courts for which could find public record searches:. Monroe County only.
- marriage licenses san antonio texas?
- ventura vehicle accident reports databases.
- Texas. District Court (Jefferson County):.
- application for marriage license houston texas.
You must register to search court records. Several counties have searchable databases. Gary , S. Flores , S. As explained above, direct or circumstantial evidence may establish an agreement to be married. Small, S. Evidence of cohabitation and representations to others that the parties are married may show circumstantial evidence of an agreement to be married.
See Lee v. Lee , S. They each submitted a Statement of Marital Relationship in which they both stated that they began living together in a husband and wife relationship in March after this ceremonial marriage and continued to live together and represent to others that they were married after they moved to Texas in Furthermore, section 6. The second element for a valid common-law marriage requires that the couple live together in Texas as spouses.
However, courts have not required the living arrangement to be continuous. McMaster, S. The third element for a valid common-law marriage requires that the couple held out to the public, or represented to others while living in Texas, that they were married.
Spoken words are not necessary to prove this element; rather, the focus is upon whether the couple had a reputation for being married. Occasional introductions as husband and wife are not enough to satisfy the holding out requirement, and there is no such thing as a secret common-law marriage. Threet , S. This evidence is sufficient to establish their status in the community as a married couple. See In re Estate of Giessel , S. In re Estate of Giessel , S. They were living as a married couple in Texas and under the belief that they were married for eight years from until And they continued to live together after that time and currently live together in There is no such thing as a common-law divorce.
A common-law marriage exists when the three elements an agreement to be married, marital cohabitation in Texas, and representation of the marital relationship are present. See Farrell v. Farrell , S.
In addition, all elements must exist at the same time. See Bolash v.
Orange County Marriage & Divorce Records
Heid , S. App-San Antonio , no writ. See Williams v. Home Indem. Co, , S. The NH was domiciled in Texas at the time of his death. The claimant and the NH had a valid Texas common-law marriage beginning in Texas recognizes common-law marriages. She stated that all the divorce documents were signed and filed with an attorney. To the best of her knowledge, she received a copy of the final divorce decree, but the documents were either lost or destroyed. However, when she attempted to find proof of the divorce, she learned that their divorce action had been dismissed.
They divorced on March XX, See Russell v. A man and woman may prove a valid common-law marriage by showing 1 an agreement to be married, 2 cohabitation in Texas as husband and wife, and 3 proof of representation to others that they are married.
StatE , S. The elements of common-law marriage—an agreement to be married, marital cohabitation in Texas, and representation of the marital relationship to others—are determined on a case-by-case basis. Section 2. This declaration affirms the elements, described above, of a common-law marriage. A Declaration of Informal Marriage recorded by the county clerk is prima facie evidence of the marriage of the parties. Under Texas law, a marriage is void if entered into when either party has an existing, undissolved marriage.
Newell Recycling of San Antonio , L. See In re Estate of Loveless , 64 S. When an applicant applies for spousal benefits, the agency requires evidence of a marriage. See 20 C. As noted above, under Texas law, Declarations of Informal Marriage recorded by the county clerk constitute prima facie evidence of the marriage of the parties. We have no evidence contradicting the validity of the common-law marriage as the Declaration presents.
See Colburn v. Though the law recognizes common-law marriage, Texas law does not recognize common-law divorce. Estate of Claveria, S. A subsequent ceremonial marriage does not set aside, dissolve, or annul the prior common-law marriage.
Order Records Locally
Aldana v. Aldana, 42 S.
Rather, a common-law marriage, like any other marriage, only terminates at the death of one of the spouses or a court order dissolving the marriage. As to a dissolution of marriage, a Texas court renders a judgment of divorce when a court makes an official announcement, either in writing or orally in open court, of its decision on the matter. See In re Marriage of Joyner , S. There is no indication that either party filed a Motion to Reinstate within the time limits prescribed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Dodd, 17 S. The agency conducted a search of divorce records in Jefferson County and found no record of divorce between and Evidence of the absence of official divorce or annulment records will rebut the presumption that the prior marriage was dissolved and that the most recent marriage is valid.
See Davis v. Davis , S. See Estate of Claveria , S.
- locating someone for free in uk.
- Modern Records (Post-1900).
- dui classes for mchenry county illinois;
The agency received competing claims for surviving spouse's benefits. Once evidence is presented that the previous marriage was not dissolved, determining whether the presumption of validity of the last marriage applies is a factual decision. A spouse's acknowledgment of the marriage and the births of children are factors to consider in determining whether the presumption applies. The fact that the number holder NH never divorced his first wife rebuts the presumption of the validity of the later marriage to the claimant.